AI-nterprise · Book & open framework

Ottaviano De Cicco

People and agents.
One enterprise.

An AI-nterprise is an organization where people and AI agents work together, with explicit rules for what counts as knowledge, who may judge and act, and how corrections change future work.

Examine one decision · free worksheet

Working together. Learning as an organization.

People · agents · shared work
People

Purpose, judgment
and mandate.

AI agents

Retrieve, draft
and act within scope.

A basis
for a decision.

Claim · evidence · context
Review for this useExplore the gate

Authorized action or revision

  1. Findings
  2. Verified
    correction
  3. Authorized
    change
  4. Next relevant
    case
People and agents contribute to the same work. The square marks the use-time gate, shown in detail below.
02 / The enterprise at work

What changes when
agents join the work?

An agent can help prepare an assessment, recommend a decision or carry out an action. The organization must decide what that work may be relied on for, who has authority, and how a correction reaches the next case.

Judgment with the
power to challenge.

Who can question the evidence, disagree with a recommendation and change the decision?

Authority that
can be traced.

Who granted the mandate, for which purpose, and who can change or revoke it?

Learning that changes
the next case.

Which corrections have been checked, authorized for reuse and shown to affect the next relevant use?

Output is
not knowledge.

Capability is
not authority.

Human presence is not
meaningful human power.

AI-nterprise: light paper cover with deep green AI and central node

The book · Ottaviano De Cicco

AI-nterprise

Governing Knowledge, Judgment, and Authority in the Age of AI Agents

AI-nterprise examines how the work of people and AI agents becomes a basis for organizational decisions. It connects knowledge, judgment and authority with practical ways to design a bounded initiative and turn expert correction into reusable learning.

Forthcoming · Q4 2026 · English edition

Explore the book
03 / The framework

From shared work
to a basis for action.

A claim may come from a person or an agent. Evidence that supports it and a mandate to act are separate conditions. They meet when the claim is used.

The moment of consequenceA specific claim version reaches a gate. Knowledge and Authority converge on the same gate. One conditional route leads to an effect; another holds the proposed use for review. Assurance probes Knowledge, Authority and the gate and sends findings to the correction owner. No assurance connection enters the action route.What is claimedWhat is decidedWhat happensPerson or agentv3Claim · a specific versionFour independent decisions: standing, persistence, visibility, action enablementFour independent decisions: standing, persistence, visibility, action enablementFour independent decisions: standing, persistence, visibility, action enablementFour independent decisions: standing, persistence, visibility, action enablementGateIf enabled for this useC2Effect within scopeKnowledgeEvidence · standingAuthorityMandate · limitsUse heldProposal for reviewAssurance · independent checksOwner · correction
The moment of consequenceVertical composition. A held proposal returns for review. Knowledge and Authority enter the same central gate. Three assurance probes are separate from the conditional action route and return findings to the correction owner.What is claimedv3Person or agentWhat is decidedFour independent decisions: standing, persistence, visibility, action enablementFour independent decisions: standing, persistence, visibility, action enablementFour independent decisions: standing, persistence, visibility, action enablementFour independent decisions: standing, persistence, visibility, action enablementGateKnowledgeAuthorityUse heldReviewIf enabledfor this useWhat happensC2Effect within scopeAssuranceChecks planes and gateOwner · correction
The moment of consequence. Knowledge and authority meet at use time. A held use leaves the stored claim version intact.Four independent decisions: standing · persistence · visibility · action enablement.

Assurance tests the planes and the gate. Its findings go to the responsible owner for correction, separately from the action route.

Inside the framework Four dimensions · three planes · three loops

Four separate decisions

Standing
Is this claim warranted for this use?
Persistence
What remains eligible for use, and what history must be kept?
Visibility
Who may retrieve which representation and context?
Action enablement
Who may act, within which boundary?

Three control planes

Knowledge and Authority supply distinct conditions at the gate. Assurance independently tests both planes and the gate. Its findings go to the responsible owner for correction.

Three coupled loops

Production creates work and revisions. Assurance challenges and tests. Learning turns verified correction into a change in the next relevant case.

The square's four edge marks represent separate decisions; they are not four green approval lights. This is the book's reference model.

04 / The introduction

AI-nterprise
in 95 seconds.

People and AI agents contribute to the same work. Follow how that work becomes an organizational decision, and how a verified correction changes the next case.

95 seconds · English narration · Sound on when you choose

Watch the introductionPeople, decisions and learning · 95 seconds

An illustration of the book's ideas. Explore the visual framework.

05 / The public foundation

Read the argument.
Explore the foundation.

The manifesto introduces the argument. The white paper sets out the reference model, its distinctions and limits.

White paper · Version 1.0 · 3 September 2026

06 / Ideas

Judgment, learning
and the enterprise.

Explore all Ideas

A book and an open framework by Ottaviano De Cicco. About the author